[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Crash: Recursive coroutine with pcall leads to stackoverflow of interpreter
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:20:30 -0300
> It's my pleasure to contribute in Lua.
>
> Even though I can't sure whether my solution for this crash is good or not,
> I hope someone can find awesome way to patch this problem.
I think the concept is correct, but it seems simpler to increment nCcalls
only in one point, upon entry to lua_resume. My particular fix is below.
--------------------------------------------------------
@@ -759,11 +759,10 @@ static void resume (lua_State *L, void *ud) {
StkId firstArg = L->top - n; /* first argument */
CallInfo *ci = L->ci;
if (L->status == LUA_OK) /* starting a coroutine? */
- ccall(L, firstArg - 1, LUA_MULTRET, 1); /* just call its body */
+ ccall(L, firstArg - 1, LUA_MULTRET, 0); /* just call its body */
else { /* resuming from previous yield */
lua_assert(L->status == LUA_YIELD);
L->status = LUA_OK; /* mark that it is running (again) */
- luaE_incCstack(L); /* control the C stack */
if (isLua(ci)) { /* yielded inside a hook? */
L->top = firstArg; /* discard arguments */
luaV_execute(L, ci); /* just continue running Lua code */
@@ -814,6 +813,9 @@ LUA_API int lua_resume (lua_State *L, lua_State *from, int nargs,
else if (L->status != LUA_YIELD) /* ended with errors? */
return resume_error(L, "cannot resume dead coroutine", nargs);
L->nCcalls = (from) ? getCcalls(from) : 0;
+ if (getCcalls(L) >= LUAI_MAXCCALLS)
+ return resume_error(L, "C stack overflow", nargs);
+ L->nCcalls++;
luai_userstateresume(L, nargs);
api_checknelems(L, (L->status == LUA_OK) ? nargs + 1 : nargs);
status = luaD_rawrunprotected(L, resume, &nargs);
--------------------------------------------------------
-- Roberto