Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.3 (rc1) now available

[Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>]

> [...]
> If that can really crash Lua, the check should probably be always
> on, as this seems a quite common error for one to make. Maybe the
> function could always raise a normal error when popping an active
> to-be-closed variable?

As this seems a quite common error for one to make, instead of raising a
normal error when popping an active to-be-closed variable maybe lua_pop
could just close those variables, after all. (As it was before :-)

-- Roberto