[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Question about to-be-closed methods
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@...>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 23:20:18 +0100
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 23:16, Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Dibyendu" == Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk> writes:
>
> Dibyendu> I have yet to see a complex program survive after a heap
> Dibyendu> failure.
>
> PostgreSQL is very good at it, to give just one example.
>
This is becoming OT so maybe we should take it offline. I am curious though.
Database systems tend to pre-allocate essential memory they need. As
long as the DBMS can rollback to a consistent state it doesn't really
care about failure in a stored proc if that is what you are referring
to.
Regards
Dibyendu
- References:
- Question about to-be-closed methods, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Andrew Gierth
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Question about to-be-closed methods, Andrew Gierth