Re: [proposal] "or if" - run this next block if the previous one ran *or if* the condition is true

[Chris Jones <cmsj@...>]

I don't think the proposed syntax really fits with what the word "or" means.

On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 15:30, Soni "They/Them" L. <fakedme@gmail.com> wrote:

I'd like to have the ability to convert, say:

switch (op) {
case OP_TAILCALL: {
   ...
   /*fallthrough*/
}
case OP_CALL: {
   ...
   break;
}
}

into:

if op == OP_TAILCALL then
   ...
   -- fallthrough
orif op == OP_CALL then
   ...
end

because it looks nicer this way I guess.

--

Cheers,

Chris