Re: [NoW] Once more about to-be-closed variables

[Sean Conner <sean@...>]

It was thus said that the Great Egor Skriptunoff once stated:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:37 AM Sean Conner wrote:
> 
> >   Um ... it's Tuesday.  Shouldn't this come out tomorrow?
> 
> It's Wednesday in Moscow.
> So, I can start nitpicking.
> Apparently you still can not :-)

  Ah.  Darn timezones.

> > > Why they must be const?
> >
> >   I think it's to prevent the value from being lost and thus, not closed.
> 
> Do we need this "protection"?
> Which adversary we should be protected from?

  Typos, mistakes, stuff like that I guess.

  -spc