Re: [NoW] Once more about to-be-closed variables

[Egor Skriptunoff <egor.skriptunoff@...>]

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:37 AM Sean Conner wrote:

  Um ... it's Tuesday.  Shouldn't this come out tomorrow?

It's Wednesday in Moscow.

So, I can start nitpicking.

Apparently you still can not :-)

 

> Why they must be const?

  I think it's to prevent the value from being lost and thus, not closed.

Do we need this "protection"?

Which adversary we should be protected from?