[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors
- From: Jim <sysinit@...>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:22:40 +0200
24.06.2019, 22:43, "Jim" <sysinit@yandex.com>:
>> How about __descope? It is a word. __enscope isn't, but we could create it
>> if we ever wanted the converse operation.
> __not(_)in(_)use ?
> __(d,g)one ?
> __dead ?
__free ?
- References:
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Francisco Olarte
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, David Heiko Kolf
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Francisco Olarte
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, David Heiko Kolf
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Francisco Olarte
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Sergey Kovalev
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Jim
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Jim
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Tony Papadimitriou
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Diego Nehab
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Jim
