[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors
- From: Jim <sysinit@...>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:42:55 +0200
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 05:11:16PM -0300, Diego Nehab wrote:
> How about __descope? It is a word. __enscope isn't, but we could create it
> if we ever wanted the converse operation.
__not(_)in(_)use ?
__(d,g)one ?
__dead ?
- References:
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Francisco Olarte
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, David Heiko Kolf
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Francisco Olarte
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, David Heiko Kolf
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Francisco Olarte
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Sergey Kovalev
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Jim
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Jim
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Tony Papadimitriou
- Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors, Diego Nehab
