[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Discover default package.path, package.cpath?
- From: Coda Highland <chighland@...>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:34:42 -0600
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 6:38 AM Roberto Ierusalimschy
<roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>
> > What are you trying to prevent? What are you trying to protect?
>
> This is a main question here. if you cannot trust LUA_PATH/LUA_CPATH,
> you probably cannot trust LUA_INIT either. If you cannot trust LUA_INIT,
> you cannot trust anything.
>
> (Can you trust the script name? Are sure it is your scipt that is
> running, and not something else? :-)
"I think, therefore I am." Any test that evaluates "am I running?"
must always return true, for it would be a paradox to do otherwise.
/s/ Adam
- References:
- Discover default package.path, package.cpath?, Norman Ramsey
- Re: Discover default package.path, package.cpath?, Sean Conner
- Re: Discover default package.path, package.cpath?, Norman Ramsey
- Re: Discover default package.path, package.cpath?, nobody
- Re: Discover default package.path, package.cpath?, Muh Muhten
- Re: Discover default package.path, package.cpath?, Roberto Ierusalimschy