[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Exception handling (was Re: ...add to Lua...)
- From: Sean Conner <sean@...>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:53:26 -0400
It was thus said that the Great Tim Hill once stated:
>
>
> > On Sep 17, 2018, at 12:36 AM, Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> wrote:
> >
> > 1) it is handled by the routine itself
> > a) no check is performed at all [5]
> > b) the error condition is noticed but ignored
>
> 1c) The error condition is corrected by the routine itself.
Thanks. I forgot that bit.
-spc
- References:
- Re: new thought experiment: what would you add to Lua ?, John Hind
- Re: new thought experiment: what would you add to Lua ?, Alysson Cunha
- Re: new thought experiment: what would you add to Lua ?, Peter Hickman
- Re: new thought experiment: what would you add to Lua ?, Sam Putman
- Re: new thought experiment: what would you add to Lua ?, Alysson Cunha
- Re: new thought experiment: what would you add to Lua ?, Sean Conner
- Re: new thought experiment: what would you add to Lua ?, Sean Conner
- Exception handling (was Re: ...add to Lua...), Dirk Laurie
- Re: Exception handling (was Re: ...add to Lua...), Sean Conner
- Re: Exception handling (was Re: ...add to Lua...), Tim Hill