lua-l archive
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Subject
:
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
From
: Viacheslav Usov <via.usov@
...
>
Date
: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 22:13:32 +0200
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:04 PM Sean Conner <
sean@conman.org
> wrote:
> Yes, but the resources that require cleanup if leaving scope are typically written in C ...
... and cleaned up via the __gc metamethod. I do not think deterministic finalisation has to break that.
Cheers,
V.
References
:
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
Dibyendu Majumdar
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
Roberto Ierusalimschy
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
John Belmonte
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
Viacheslav Usov
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
John Belmonte
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
Roberto Ierusalimschy
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
Javier Guerra Giraldez
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
Roberto Ierusalimschy
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
Tim Hill
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
Viacheslav Usov
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
,
Sean Conner
Prev by Date:
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
Next by Date:
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
Previous by thread:
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
Next by thread:
Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
Index(es):
Date
Thread