lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] 



On 2018-01-30 10:51 AM, Dirk Laurie wrote:

2018-01-30 14:23 GMT+02:00 Soni "They/Them" L. <fakedme@gmail.com>:


On 2018-01-30 06:58 AM, Francisco Olarte wrote:

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Soni "They/Them" L. <fakedme@gmail.com>
wrote:
...

Also, rationals are still numbers. They're just not "Lua numbers"
(objects
with type(x) == "number"). Any language with operator overloading (e.g.
C++)
lets me have numeric for with rationals. Except Lua. (Python doesn't have
numeric for at all so it doesn't count.)

C++ does not have numeric for, so it doesn't count either.

Francisco Olarte.


for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) { printf("%d\n", i); }

Looks like it does, it's just more flexible than Lua's.

No 'for' is more flexible than Lua's.

for a,b,c,as_many_as_you_like in myiter(anything) do
end
Sorry, C++'s numeric for is more flexible than Lua, because it gives you more control over the iteration.
You can also use rational objects which overload < and ++ in C++ numeric fors, while you can't in Lua even with __add and __lt. 

--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.