Re: Numeric for loop with rationals

["Soni \"They/Them\" L." <fakedme@...>]

On 2018-01-30 06:58 AM, Francisco Olarte wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Soni "They/Them" L. <fakedme@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> > Also, rationals are still numbers. They're just not "Lua numbers" (objects
> > with type(x) == "number"). Any language with operator overloading (e.g. C++)
> > lets me have numeric for with rationals. Except Lua. (Python doesn't have
> > numeric for at all so it doesn't count.)
> C++ does not have numeric for, so it doesn't count either.
>
> Francisco Olarte.

for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) { printf("%d\n", i); }

Looks like it does, it's just more flexible than Lua's.

--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.