Re: A proposal for the confusing pseudo table ≈ array concept

[Sean Conner <sean@...>]

It was thus said that the Great Coda Highland once stated:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:37 PM, Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> wrote:
> > It was thus said that the Great Elias Hogstvedt once stated:
> >> I'm also wondering if for instance the introduction
> >> of [] as a constructor would cause issues with other syntax (backwards
> >> compatibility aside) or if these changes could make the C implementation
> >> more difficult.
> >
> >   I wouldn't mind this change---it would signal intent better in my opinion.
> >
> >   -spc
> >
> 
> It would introduce a syntactic inconsistency. x"1" and x{1} are both
> unambiguously function calls, but x[1] is a table lookup, and x[1,2]
> is a syntax error.

  Hmm ... yeah ... probably not a good idea.

  -spc (Just thought it might be nice, didn't bother to think things
	through ... )