Re: [PATCH] Loop Overflow Bug Fix

["Soni L." <fakedme@...>]

On 2017-11-21 08:11 AM, Peter Billam wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> > 2017-11-20 22:36 GMT+02:00 Soni L. <fakedme@gmail.com>:
> > > Why not just get rid of for loops?
>
> One of my more reliable rules-of-thumb:
>   Never trust a sentence with 'just' in it.
>
> Eg:
>   Why don't they just make some more ozone and pump it up there ?
> Many other examples...  :-)
>
> Peter Billam
>
> http://www.pjb.com.au    ; pjb@pjb.com.au     (03) 6278 9410
> "Follow the charge, not the particle."  --  Richard Feynman
>  from The Theory of Positrons, Physical Review, 1949

As someone who hasn't actually used any Lisp yet (whether you believe 
that is another matter), what's wrong with turning Lua into a new form 
of Lisp? It even starts with an L!

(somewhat relevant: Greenspun's tenth rule)

--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.