Re: [PATCH] Loop Overflow Bug Fix

[Coda Highland <chighland@...>]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Paige DePol <lual@serfnet.org> wrote:
> At least with my patch one surprise is removed when using min/max integers,
> and another when using floating loops and a step size magnitude that is
> too small to properly affect the loop variables. Thinking about what Dirk
> said as well, one final tweak could be done with floating loops by adding
> half the step size to the loop limit variable to ensure the final iteration
> is executed in the case where the floating precision drifts.

Except that'll cause an EXTRA iteration to happen if you do something
like `1, 9.9, 1`.

/s/ Adam