 |
lua-l archive |
|
|
||
|
On 2017-07-03 04:42 PM, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> 2017-07-03 21:35 GMT+02:00 Soni L. <fakedme@gmail.com>:
>
>> That was a feature request. And that trick doesn't work for captures
>> beyond 1 without introducing nils or a massive performance hit.
> Would the requested feature make `pat/-2` drop the second capture
> or the first two captures?
The former (drop the second).
>
>> On 2017-07-03 04:31 PM, Dirk Laurie wrote:
>>> No. But you can have it so `pat / drop` does that.
>>>
>>>
>>> function drop(x,...) return ... end
>>>
>>> 2017-06-30 17:14 GMT+02:00 Soni L. <fakedme@gmail.com <mailto:fakedme@gmail.com>>:
>>>
>>> So uh can I have it so `pat / -1` removes capture 1 from pat,
>>> while leaving all others untouched?
--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.