[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LPeg capture exclusion
- From: "Soni L." <fakedme@...>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:01:33 -0300
On 2017-07-03 04:42 PM, Dirk Laurie wrote:
2017-07-03 21:35 GMT+02:00 Soni L. <fakedme@gmail.com>:
That was a feature request. And that trick doesn't work for captures
beyond 1 without introducing nils or a massive performance hit.
Would the requested feature make `pat/-2` drop the second capture
or the first two captures?
The former (drop the second).
On 2017-07-03 04:31 PM, Dirk Laurie wrote:
No. But you can have it so `pat / drop` does that.
function drop(x,...) return ... end
2017-06-30 17:14 GMT+02:00 Soni L. <fakedme@gmail.com <mailto:fakedme@gmail.com>>:
So uh can I have it so `pat / -1` removes capture 1 from pat,
while leaving all others untouched?
--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.