[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: math libraries for Lua
- From: Hisham <h@...>
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 16:46:02 -0300
On 14 May 2017 at 03:14, Dirk Laurie <email@example.com> wrote:
> 2017-05-12 11:27 GMT+02:00 Dirk Laurie <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>> 2017-05-11 18:23 GMT+02:00 Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <email@example.com>:
>>> * One, biased, starting point are my own libraries:
>>> Are they any good?
>> They are very good. I use:
>> complex mathx xml ltokenp
>> and I have srlua downloaded in case I need it (not yet, so far).
>> Not all mathematical, of course, but they are good models to follow
>> when building one's own. The documentation is sparse but adequate
>> for people that have enough skills to adapt the Makefiles to their own
> Having been re-alerted to then, I downloaded some and tried
> to build them and found out al over again that editing the Makefile
> is not 100% straightforward.
> Now if those modules had a rockspec, "luarocks make ROCKSPEC"
> would know where to find lua and whether -fPIC is necessary on my
Apparently pleading for upstream to support LuaRocks in my LuaConf
talk last year and even explicitly mentioning "you won't have to hear
about your users' troubles with -fPIC anymore!" was not sufficient.