Re: Library granularity

[Phil Leblanc <philanc@...>]

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Tim Hume <tim@nomuka.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 14:35:23 -0500
>
> This sounds really useful.

Thanks!

> I think this is a matter of personal preference. I think I'd like using
> the single library. Breaking it up into tiny libraries would take more
> work. If you prefer a single library, why don't you share this and let
> anyone who wants to break it up do it themselves?

This is what I have done for the moment at https://github.com/philanc/luazen

I like the idea of sharing _source code_ and let others use the source
in their own projects.

On the other hand, it looks like people are increasingly sharing
ready-to-use libraries with platform and tools like LuaRocks.

With this approach, people expect to just _import a functionality_,
not browse a bunch of source file and pick and choose what they want.
Thus my questions about granularity...

Phil