[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Bug report in length of simple table
- From: Peter Aronoff <telemachus@...>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:39:39 -0400
Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@gmail.com> wrote:
> All of it is implementation detail, yes. It's just that some people (me,
> for example) like to understand _exactly_ why something happens and don't
> mind reading the comments in the Lua source if necessary.
All well and good, but I want to stay *VERY* clear about what is part of
the spec for the language and what is (merely) an implementation detail.
This issue is gnarled enough as it is. I don’t want to get confused about
what’s promised and what just happens to be the case in a (current,
particular) implementation.
Thanks, P
--
We have not been faced with the need to satisfy someone else's
requirements, and for this freedom we are grateful.
Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, The UNIX Time-Sharing System
- References:
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Marc Balmer
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Malma
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Oliver Kroth
- RE: Bug report in length of simple table, Tomas.Lavicka
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Jonathan Goble
- RE: Bug report in length of simple table, Tomas.Lavicka
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Jonathan Goble
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Peter Aronoff
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Dirk Laurie