[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Bug report in length of simple table
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:28:21 +0200
2016-09-14 16:23 GMT+02:00 Peter Aronoff <telemachus@arpinum.org>:
> While we are on this *advanced* subject, I have a question: none of this
> “array part” and “hash part” stuff is guaranteed, right? That is, you
> shouldn’t rely on it in your code, should you? (Not that it’s immediately
> clear to me how you would even rely on it, but just to be clear.)
All of it is implementation detail, yes. It's just that some people
(me, for example) like to understand _exactly_ why something
happens and don't mind reading the comments in the Lua source
if necessary.
- References:
- Bug report in length of simple table, Tomas.Lavicka
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Marc Balmer
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Malma
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Oliver Kroth
- RE: Bug report in length of simple table, Tomas.Lavicka
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Jonathan Goble
- RE: Bug report in length of simple table, Tomas.Lavicka
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Jonathan Goble
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Bug report in length of simple table, Peter Aronoff