Re: Issues with the current varargs implementation (Was: Re: inadequate documentation for select and table.unpack)

[Viacheslav Usov <via.usov@...>]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Andrew Starks <andrew@starksfam.org> wrote:

> Using them as intended, to provide a variable number of arguments to a function, requires no change in the documentation.

The documentation today, even if we consider the latest edition of PiL as part of it, suggests very clearly that {...} is the way to handle variadic arguments. Is that what your "as intended" means?

Cheers,

V.