Re: Issues with the current varargs implementation (Was: Re: inadequate documentation for select and table.unpack)

[Viacheslav Usov <via.usov@...>]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Philipp Janda <siffiejoe@gmx.net> wrote:

> I have attached another micro benchmark for iterating varargs. It appears that the break-even point is around 4 arguments in `...` (which is sooner than I expected):

I'd interpret your results a little differently: select is clearly preferential perf-wise for one or two arguments, then just use {...}.

Cheers,

V.