[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Can't luarocks and/or the luaposix rockspec be a little smarter?
- From: Peter Melnichenko <mpeterval@...>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:37:52 +0300
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Dirk Laurie <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Why can't it check first of all if the output "lua -v" complies with
> what is needed? And only if it isn't, start to guess under what
> name the alternative interpreter might be available?
luaposix just uses whatever luarocks passes to it: it's built using a command
that starts with `./configure LUA='$(LUA)'`, where LUA variable is
luarocks, with a wrong value 'lua53' in this case. It should come from
module that is generated on luarocks installation. Could you send its contents?
The file is with all other modules, probably in
-- Peter Melnichenko