Re: some random thoughts on naming conventions for Lua libraries/modules

[Hisham <h@...>]

On 13 June 2016 at 09:06, Pierre Chapuis <catwell@archlinux.us> wrote:
> June 13 2016 12:36 PM, "Soni L." <fakedme@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 13/06/16 06:43 AM, Pierre Chapuis wrote:
>
>>> I like the idea but using a dot in the name of a GitHub repository may
>>> cause issues if you use GitHub pages, among other things (because they
>>> use it in a domain name).
>>
>> What? No they don't. They use it in a path name. You're confusing organization/user pages with repo
>> pages.
>
> You're completely right, please ignore this :)
> The .lua names sound like a good idea then.

Great to know! I've never used it myself (yet) but I'm growing fond of
the foo.lua naming scheme for project names as well (since it goes
well with `foo-1.0-1.rockspec` and `local foo = require("foo")`

-- Hisham