[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Introducing luavm - Lua Version Manager
- From: Sean Conner <sean@...>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 03:17:25 -0400
It was thus said that the Great Hisham once stated:
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Andrew Starks <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> Yes. It would be much clearer to have Lua-env, which will be super easy to
> >> distinguish from luaenv. ;) sarcastic comments are mean but I hope you take
> >> my point anyway
> >> You got 4 votes for uselua and you are free to name it what you wish. This
> >> goes from something universally confusing to very confusing, at least from a
> >> search perspective.
> Creative design by voting doesn't work very well. An idea may have a
> few vocal supporters and a number of people who don't like it but also
> don't hate it enough to argue against it.
I personally liked alualua but apparently, I'm the only one ...
> I disliked uselua for the
> precise reason Dhaval mentioned:
> On 7 June 2016 at 02:00, Dhaval Kapil <email@example.com> wrote:
> > 'uselua use-luarocks 2.3.0' doesn't sound nice. Otherwise I was fine with
> > it.
% uselua rocks 2.3 ...
% uselua -5.1 rocks 2.3 ...
$ uselua -jit ...
or, the one I liked:
% lua123 rocks 2.3 ...
% lua123 -3 rocks 2.3 ...
-spc (There's also "quelua" which literally translates  to "which
 If you trust what Google Translate says ...