[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] LGSL 0.1 released
- From: Nagaev Boris <bnagaev@...>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 21:02:50 +0300
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Lesley De Cruz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 30 January 2016 at 17:12, Marc Balmer <email@example.com> wrote:
>> How can you say it's "a numerical library for Lua" when effectively this
>> is for LuaJIT?
>> LuaJIT ~= Lua
>> It should be named LJGSL, not LGSL, imo.
> It's written in/for Lua, it just uses a library that is currently only
> available for LuaJIT.
> Most of it should work fine in Lua (albeit not as fast) when/if the FFI
> library for Lua  supports the necessary features.
> Best regards,
>  https://github.com/jmckaskill/luaffi
For my, Lua in the first place is what can be parsed by Lua 5.1-5.3,
not what can be executed by some specific Lua implementation /
library. I wish Lua syntax never changed...