[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Why gc sweepstep() doesn't return the real free bytes?
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:30:52 -0200
> I hope the delay time of player's operation can be low,
> and the CPU's usage is smooth in all the time.
> In propagate state, it is OK.
> But in sweep state, the delay time increases obviously.
> It usually take a few seconds for player to see the menu content after click the menu on client.
> This is boring.
> Actually, I set the "setpause" value to a small value to avoid the memory usage increase to a large value,
> once the memory usage increase , the total execute time of atomic() function becomes long,
> it will also increase the delay time of player's operation.
> Whether it is a solution to change the sweepstep() to return the real free bytes,
> so the CPU's usage is smooth in sweep state like the propagate state.
What happens if you increase GCSWEEPCOST (and maybe reduce even more the