Re: status and perceptions of luaproc

[书呆彭, Peng Yi <nerditation@...>]

在 2015/7/25 17:40, Mason Bogue 写道:
> http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~roberto/docs/ry08-05.pdf
>
> This library -- which seems to show that Lua can handle concurrent
> programming quite well -- doesn't appear to be maintained. That's
> unfortunate, because I don't know if the other solutions available
> replicate the advantages of luaproc, viz. performance and simplicity.
> The major alternative, Lua Lanes, doesn't seem to be terrifically fast
> and seems to have been in bugfix mode for two years (
> https://github.com/LuaLanes/lanes/commits/master ), while the
> commonly-accepted solution is to use llthreads with 0mq, and I have a
> hard time believing either of these even comes close to luaproc,
> performance-wise, considering that Skyrme et al went as far as to draw
> comparisons to Erlang while spinning up myriad fibers; Lanes' green
> threads are much heavier than fibers and its scheduler was good but
> not spectacular the last time I checked, whereas llthreads is 1:1, not
> M:N (thus a very different model).

after reading the thesis, I recall a library called 'ltask'
from this thread[1] not very long ago.
you might want to check that.
it uses an M:N scheduler and channels.
I feel it similar to 'luaproc'.

[1] http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2015-04/msg00441.html

--
the nerdy Peng / 书呆彭 / Sent from Thunderbird