[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: why benchmarks need salt
- From: Josh Simmons <simmons.44@...>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:05:36 +1000
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Enrico Colombini <erix@erix.it> wrote:
>
> While you are busy writing that paper ;-) I ran a few tests under Linux with
> a freshly compiled 5.3.1, randomizing the executable name length from 1 to
> 10 characters.
>
STABILISER is also very interesting for the wider case of dealing with
benchmark variance.
http://people.cs.umass.edu/~emery/pubs/stabilizer-asplos13.pdf
