[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes
- From: Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@...>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:09:54 +0100
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 00:05:23 +0900, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On 15/07/2015 00:03, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > The one Lua-based project I have which really doesn't play nicely with multiple
> > lua versions simply refuses to work if the version is not the one it is written
> > for.
>
> I think the take-away here is that each minor revision of Lua should be
> regarded as a different language. If that's the policy, then, fine, I'll
> run with it.
It's certainly how I run with it. Some of my work can be used in more than
one of these sub-languages, but not always.
D.
--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.digital-scurf.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69
- References:
- A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Rob Kendrick
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Coda Highland
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Daniel Silverstone
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens