Re: [Proposal] _LOCAL was: Re: how to call a local function by its name?

[Nagaev Boris <bnagaev@...>]

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Soni L. <fakedme@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/06/15 06:05 PM, Soni L. wrote:
>
> I wish you could access your own locals with an _LOCAL[idx] that would be
> faster than debug.getlocal...
>
> Not sure how that'd work if you local x = _LOCAL, or called a function with
> _LOCAL...
>
> Actually I do know, _LOCAL tables would be like any other tables, but
> heavily optimized for this kind of stuff, and it'd be part of the function's
> call stack entry thingy. The GC can take care of the rest.

More things should not be used than are necessary.


>
>
> --
> Disclaimer: these emails are public and can be accessed from <TODO: get a
> non-DHCP IP and put it here>. If you do not agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.
>
>
> --
> Disclaimer: these emails are public and can be accessed from <TODO: get a
> non-DHCP IP and put it here>. If you do not agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.



-- 


Best regards,
Boris Nagaev