Re: metatables for strings?

[Daurnimator <quae@...>]

On 6 May 2015 at 16:06, steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Which feels too .. magical .. to me. Too baked into the language.
> Customizable literals are the way forward there, but we have the
> supremely flexible table {} constructor.
>

Also the no parenthesis sugar for strings.
e.g. this is valid: myurl = url "http://lua.org/";