Re: OP_TAILCALL versus OP_CALL question

[Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@...>]

On 21 March 2015 at 22:03, Pierre-Yves Gérardy <pygy79@gmail.com> wrote:
> The trouble is that you can't do that with LLVM.
>
> It does support TCO, though, at the expense of easy C interop (you
> have to use incompatible calling conventions which breaks the ABI). As
> long as you don't want to mix C and Lua/Ravi code, FFI-style, you
> should be fine.
>
> http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#tail-call-optimization
> http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#calling-conventions

Thanks ... I will look into this.