Re: [ANN] luaposix 33.0.0 released

["Gary V. Vaughan" <gary@...>]

> On Nov 4, 2014, at 5:52 PM, Ką Mykolas <kamicc@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> And I doubt it's going to be ported. Since 5.3 Lua does have native
> binary operators, so....

Even so, I'm not ready to drop support for LuaJIT and 5.1.  And it's
probably easier to port luabitop than add per-version-dependencies to
luarocks :(

> On 11/4/14, Gary V. Vaughan <gary@vaughan.pe> wrote:
>> Hi Dirk,
>> 
>> On 4 Nov 2014, at 17:30, Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 2014-11-04 19:02 GMT+02:00 Gary Vaughan <gary@vaughan.pe>:
>>> 
>>>> Install it with LuaRocks, using:
>>>> 
>>>>   luarocks install luaposix 33.0.0
>>> 
>>> This procedure does not work with Lua 5.3.0-beta.
>>> 
>>> Missing dependencies for luaposix:
>>> luabitop >= 1.0.2
>>> 
>>> gcc -O2 -fPIC -I/home/dirk/include -c bit.c -o bit.o
>>> bit.c: In function 'barg':
>>> bit.c:83:2: error: #error "Unknown number type, check LUA_NUMBER_* in
>>> luaconf.h"
>>> #error "Unknown number type, check LUA_NUMBER_* in luaconf.h"
>> 
>> Like the last several luaposix releases, luabitop is required (for LuaJIT
>> and Lua 5.1), and not yet ported to 5.3. For that matter, neither have I
>> tried to port luaposix to 5.3 yet.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT vaughan DOT Pe)
>> 
>