|
On Oct 19, 2014 8:55 AM, "Roberto Ierusalimschy" <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>
> > Maybe 'nil' could be treated differently from other nonstrings,
> > and error() be allowed.
>
> We could make an error to call 'error' with nil...
I like that. But I am a hardcore errorist, so of course I would like that.