[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Does PIL (3rd edition) repeatedly misuse the length operator on tables and invoke undefined behavior?
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:25:14 +0200
2014-09-17 19:33 GMT+02:00 <polyglot@openmailbox.org>:
> On 2014-09-18 02:36, Dirk Laurie wrote:
>>
>>
>> If you want "non-negative" spelt out, you can find it in the 5.3 manual
>> in §3.4.7.
>
>
> Looks good to me, though obviously the definition of sequence in section
> 2.1 needs changing as well.
>
> Where does it leave 5.2 users? Should the 5.2 manual be updated?
#angels_dancing_on_the_head_of_a_pin
