Re: Does PIL (3rd edition) repeatedly misuse the length operator on tables and invoke undefined behavior?

[polyglot@...]

On 2014-09-18 02:36, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> If you want "non-negative" spelt out, you can find it in the 5.3 manual
> in §3.4.7.

Looks good to me, though obviously the definition of sequence in section
2.1 needs changing as well.

Where does it leave 5.2 users? Should the 5.2 manual be updated?