On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Michael Richter <email@example.com> wrote:On 11 July 2014 12:32, Aaron Faanes <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Lua's biggest downside is …The lack of public access to real-time development is a significant impediment to public involvement.It's amazing how perspectives can differ. To me this is a selling point.To each their own. ;) I mean, I'm not for a free-for-all commit access or anything, but they could at least publish their git/svn/whatever-they-use repo and give us an opportunity to see how things are progressing. It would also give others an opportunity to patch against the latest development release (which I imagine is much more useful for upstream than patching against a maintained release, which to them is old code).