Re: debug for call ret implementation

["Victor Bombi" <sonoro@...>]

sorry, code should be

local func = getinfo(2,"f").func

if functable[func]==nil then
 local breakpoints = Debugger.breakpoints
 local debuginfo = getinfo(2,"SL")
 local activelines = debuginfo.activelines
 local source = debuginfo.source
 functable[func] = false
 if activelines then
  for line,_ in pairs(activelines) do
   if breakpoints[line] and breakpoints[line][source] then
    functable[func] = true
    break
   end
  end
 end
end

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Victor Bombi" <sonoro@telefonica.net>
To: "Lua mailing list" <lua-l@lists.lua.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 2:36 PM
Subject: debug for call ret implementation


> Hello,
>
> Trying to implement the  suggestion from PIL book about improving debug 
> hooks being first call ret hooks and then going to line debug hook when we 
> are on target function I have
>
> local func = getinfo(2,"f").func
>
> if functable[func]==nil then
>  local breakpoints = Debugger.breakpoints
>  local debuginfo = getinfo(2,"SL")
>  local activelines = debuginfo.activelines
>  local source = debuginfo.source
> local func = getinfo(2,"f").func
>
> if functable[func]==nil then
>  local breakpoints = Debugger.breakpoints
>  local debuginfo = getinfo(2,"SL")
>  local activelines = debuginfo.activelines
>  local source = debuginfo.source
>  functable[func] = false
>  if activelines then
>   for line,_ in pairs(activelines) do
>    if breakpoints[line] and breakpoints[line][source] then
>     functable[func] = true
>     break
>    end
>   end
>  end
> end
>
> then if functable[func]==true I switch to the line hook
>
> It turns out that this debugger is about twice slower than straigth line 
> hook debugger!!!
>
> Was not a good suggestion?
> My implementation is really bad?
>
> Thanks
> victor bombi