lua-l archive
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Subject
:
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
From
: Peter Hickman <peterhickman386@
...
>
Date
: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:34:14 +0100
Isn't this what strict.lua was designed for?
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
,
Coda Highland
References
:
[OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
,
Andrew Starks
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
,
David Demelier
Prev by Date:
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
Next by Date:
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
Previous by thread:
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
Next by thread:
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
Index(es):
Date
Thread
