[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@...>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 22:46:57 -0500
On Saturday, April 26, 2014, Tom N Harris <telliamed@whoopdedo.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 06:40:55 PM Rena wrote:
> One thing I've always been curious about is if some design patterns would
> be more popular in languages which are not developed by English speakers.
> E.g. Latin with its many verb forms, or Japanese with its
> subject-object-verb order (which looks a lot like postfix notation vs
> English's infix).
I'd be more curious to see what a programming language would look like if it
inherited the Japanese honor system? Can you imagine having to reference a
variable based on its hierarchical importance in the program relative to the
calling function?
Thankfully, the inventor of Ruby wasn't inspired by that part of his native
tongue.
--
tom <telliamed@whoopdedo.org>
You have it wrong! All statements would be extremely boastful and end with multiple exclamation points. Conditionals would have a syntax like, "What??? Are you nil!!!??!? Then I will over power you with my value!!! If you wish to challenge me, then I will manipulate the values at your references so thoroughly, that your ancestors will feel your shame!!!"
-Andrew
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Tom N Harris
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Rena
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Tom N Harris
- Prev by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Index(es):