[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?
- From: Geoff Leyland <geoff_leyland@...>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:50:18 +1200
On 11/04/2014, at 1:39 pm, Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> wrote:
> Don't be so dismissive of sampling profilers. I can see a scenario where
> one Lua function has a low execution count but takes more time than another
> Lua function that has a higher execution count [2].
Oh, sorry, I didn’t mean to be dismissive about sampling profilers at all: I use -jp more than I use luatrace. My point was more that in this case I didn’t use carefully enough.
- References:
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Sean Conner
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Thiago L.
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, steve donovan
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Andrew Starks
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Geoff Leyland
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Sean Conner
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Geoff Leyland
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Sean Conner
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Geoff Leyland
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Sean Conner