[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [proposal] Using nil/NaN as table index
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:20:52 +0200
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@gmail.com> wrote:
> The word 'valid' is misleading. Nil and NaN are invalid for setting,
> since the operation cannot be done, but merely futile for getting.
> Not invalid.
Ah, I see. And I've probably got code out there that depends on
exactly this behaviour ;)
