Re: 'in' keyword today (was Re: mathlib)

[Rena <hyperhacker@...>]

On 2014-04-08 1:55 PM, "Petite Abeille" <petite.abeille@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 8, 2014, at 4:41 PM, Coroutines <coroutines@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would like to see the 'in' keyword patch added to enable this: local byte, reverse, gsub in require ‘string'
>

For what it's worth, I think this would be a very nice addition as well.

(Also, very nice hack there! But I'll be the pedantic one and point out that it won't handle comments. ;) )