Re: mathlib

[steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>]

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Christopher Berardi
<cberardi32@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think you should add all of those. I am indifferent to whether the
> proposed functions should be removed or remain.

Pretty much my feeling.

> I would like to see a comprehensive (3rd party) math library for Lua, one
> that could be used for a wide variety of mathematical disciplines instead.

Well, there's lhf's lmathx, binds the extra C99 functions.  Then
things get ... complicated, because people have different mathematical
needs.

> I'll also put myself with those who want a more robust and expressive
> require function.

But precisely what does this mean?