[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: io:lines() and \0
- From: Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@...>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:56:17 -0600
On Friday, February 21, 2014, Coda Highland <chighland@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:
>> Laurie's Law: The most heated debates on Lua-L are on topics that the
>> developers will not implement.
>
> I hadn't heard of Laurie's Law. Awesome. Learning this was worth the entire
> thread.
Observe the poster's name. ;) I think it's a new coinage -- although
one that's clearly true, as the cause-and-effect relationship is
obvious.
/s/ Adam
A way to draw a lesson from Laurie's law would be to twist it a bit:
"Debate an issue hotly and you will be assured that the developers will never implement it."
-Andrew
- References:
- io:lines() and \0, René Rebe
- Re: io:lines() and \0, steve donovan
- Re: io:lines() and \0, René Rebe
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Enrico Colombini
- Re: io:lines() and \0, steve donovan
- Re: io:lines() and \0, René Rebe
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Sean Conner
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: io:lines() and \0, René Rebe
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Cezary H. Noweta
- Re: io:lines() and \0, René Rebe
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Dirk Laurie
- Re: io:lines() and \0, René Rebe
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Craig Barnes
- Re: io:lines() and \0, René Rebe
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Cezary H. Noweta
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Andrew Starks
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Dirk Laurie
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Andrew Starks
- Re: io:lines() and \0, Coda Highland