lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


Hi Hisham,

Sorry for my poor English. 

I have two box, one is 32bit debian, another is 64bit ubuntu.
I installed the lzmq by luarocks a month ago in ubuntu box, which is
0.3.1-1
I installed the lzmq a few days ago in debian box by luarocks, which is
0.3.3-1
And I noticed that lzmq released a newer version, so I was trying to
update the 0.3.1-1 in ubuntu box to be 0.3.3-1.  But "luarocks install
lzmq" always installed the 0.3.1-1 in ubuntu box.

I guess it may caused by either incorrect caches in my local or
incorrect data from server, because:
I tried the method provided by Alexey 'luarocks install lzmq 0.3.1', it
installs the 0.3.1-1, but says 'Error: No results matching query were
found.' with 'luarocks install lzmq 0.3.3'

I tried the luarocks-admin refresh_cache, it does not help.

在 2014-01-07二的 13:06 -0200,Hisham写道:
> Hello Dirk,
> 
> To clarify: you want version 0.3.3-1, but when you run `luarocks
> install lzmq` it always installs 0.3.1-1? Is that correct?
> 
> The latest rockspec for lzmq is compatible with Lua 5.1 and 5.2, so it
> shouldn't be a Lua version issue...
> 
> Can you post the full output of the following commands?
> 
>    luarocks list
> 
>    luarocks install lzmq
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> -- Hisham
> 
> On 7 January 2014 01:44, cch@srdgame <srdgame@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The LuaRocks were built from source code which is 2.1.1
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:42 AM, cch@srdgame <srdgame@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I was installed the lzmq a month ago in one ubuntu 64bit pc, which is
> >> version 0.3.1.1.  And I was installed the lzmq in another debian 32bit pc,
> >> which I got a 0.3.3.1.  I was tried to install the lzmq again in ubuntu, but
> >> it always download and install the 0.3.1.1.  Event I uninstall and install
> >> lzmq, it always install the older version.
> >>
> >> I did not find a option to let LuaRocks update the lzmq.
> >>
> >> -Dirk
> >
> >
>