Re: Issues with check_exp implementation

[Paige DePol <lual@...>]

Roberto,

No, you did not say otherwise. Sometimes I just over-explain things, or state the obvious, sorry about that! ;)

~pmd~



On Nov 13, 2013, at 5:55 AM, Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:

>> In llimits.h luai_assert() is defined as lua_assert() if LUA_USE_APICHECK is not defined. Which means if lua_assert() is defined then luai_assert() automagically works too. :)
> 
> Of course it does. (Did I say otherwise?) It does not make sense to check
> all the internals of Lua and exclude the API.
> 
> -- Roberto
>